icon-folder.gif   Conference Reports for NATAP  
 
  6th Intl Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection
 
Glasgow, Scotland Nov 17-20, 2002
Back grey_arrow_rt.gif
 
 
 
How Low Does Your Viral Load Have To Be: Kaletra plus d4T/3TC study
 
Reported by Jules Levin
 
  At the post 9/11 ICAAC (Dec 2001), researchers reported results from this study in which patients who achieved <3 copies/ml between weeks 24-72 after starting therapy did not affect the maintenance of <400 or <50 copies/ml after 144 weeks of Kaletra combination therapy. At Glasgow Perrin and Abbott reported the same findings after following patients for 204 weeks (4 years). These results apply to Kaletra plus d4T/3TC but may or may not apply to other regimens.
 
In other words, the Glasgow study found there was no greater risk of loss of viral control through 204 weeks of follow-up in patients who did not achieve 3 copies/ml during the first 24-72 weeks of therapy in this study compared to patients who did achieve 3 copies/ml during the first 72 weeks. Here is the link to my original article from ICAAC 2001 on this study:
 
Failure to Achieve HIV RNA <3 copies/mL by Week 72 Is Not Associated with Loss of Virologic Response Through 144 weeks of Lopinavir/Ritonavir-Based Therapy
 
www.natap.org/2001/ICAAC/day25.htm
 
Here are conclusions study authors presented in Glasgow:
 
Based on the ITT NC=F analysis through Week 204, 71% and 70% of patients had HIV RNA <400 copies/mL (on-treatment analysis 99%) or <50 copies/mL (on-treatment analysis 97%) at Week 204.
 
--Mean increase from baseline to Week 204 in CD4 cell count was +440 cells/mm 3.
 
--15 patients met loss of virologic response criteria.
 
7/15 remained on study through 204 weeks, and 7/7 had HIV RNA <50 at Week 204. 8/15 patients discontinued. 1 patient discontinued at Week 4 without achieving HIV RNA <400 copies/mL, 1 patient discontinued with HIV RNA resuppressed <400 copies/mL at final visit, and 6 patients discontinued after rebound (2 lost to follow-up, 4 due to noncompliance).
 
-Genotype was available on 10 patients, including all 8 who discontinued after loss of virologic response. Isolates from 0/10 patients demonstrated resistance in protease, and 3/10 demonstrated 3TC resistance.
 
--28 patients discontinued prior to Week 204, including 7 due to adverse events probably or possibly related to LPV/r. Diarrhea and nausea were the most common adverse events, and lipid elevations were the most common laboratory abnormalities.
 
100 antiretroviral naive patients entered this phase II study and as said just above 28 discontinued.
 
Glasgow abstract concluded:
 
--Whether one does or does not achievend/or sustain HIV RNA <3 copies/mL through the first 1.5 years of LPV/r therapy does not appear to predict risk of virologic failure at either <50 or <400 copies/mL through an additional 2.5 years of follow-up.
 
--Intermittent viremia >3 copies/mL may be due to assay variability, variation in adherence patterns, or other physiologic factors such as the presence of subacute intercurrent illness. The inability to suppress viral load to <3 copies/mL may be due to the aforementioned factors as well as the potential impact of the size of the reservoir of latently infected cells or the status of the immune system.
 
--These observations may differ depending on the potency, tolerability and genetic barrier of the antiretroviral regimen being evaluated.
 
--Among patients with high BL VL (>100,000 copies/mL) or low BL CD4 count (<200 cells/mm 3), virologic response through Week 204 was similar to that for patients with less advanced disease.
 
--A longer duration of follow-up is necessary to determine whether any of these virologic or immunologic factors will eventually have an impact on the duration of virologic response.