icon star paper   Hepatitis C Articles (HCV)  
Back grey_arrow_rt.gif
 
 
XTL-6865 To prevent Hepatitis C Reinfection Following Liver Transplant
 
 
  Preventing Re-infection following Liver Transplant
 
Hepatitis C is the leading cause of liver transplants in the U.S. It is estimated that in 2004, over 2,000 liver transplants were performed in the U.S. in HCV positive patients. Although the HCV infected liver is removed during the transplant procedure, the newly transplanted healthy liver is re-infected with HCV from the patient's serum. Re-infection occurs in all patients within days following the transplant. Recurrent HCV infection is the leading cause of graft failure: 10% of patients will die (or be re-transplanted) by year five due to recurrent HCV disease. A further 30% of patients will have cirrhosis at the end of year five.
 
There is no therapy available to prevent re-infection following a liver transplant. Once the liver has been re-infected, clinicians attempt to treat the recurrent disease. Response rate to this treatment is low (~20%). Therefore, re-infection following a liver transplant represents a significant unmet medical need.
 
One of the potential indications of XTL-6865 is preventing re-infection following a liver transplant. We estimate that a successful therapy for preventing re-infection with HCV following liver transplantation could reach annual worldwide sales of approximately $400 million.
 
XTL-6865 is being developed by XTLbio to prevent hepatitis C re-infection
following a liver transplant and for the treatment of chronic HCV. XTL-6865 is a combination of two fully human monoclonal antibodies (Ab68 and Ab65) against the hepatitis C virus E2 envelope protein. A single antibody version of this product, then referred to as HepeX-C, was tested in a pilot clinical program that included both Phase I and Phase II clinical trials. In April 2005, we submitted an IND to the FDA in order to commence a Phase Ia/Ib clinical trial later this year for XTL-6865, the dual-MAb product.
 
The two antibodies comprising XTL-6865 were selected by screening a large panel of candidates based on their high level of activity against the virus in our proprietary HCV models. We believe that a combination of two antibodies that bind to different epitopes is essential to provide broad coverage of virus quasispecies, and to minimize the probability for escape from therapy. We have shown that the two antibodies chosen (Ab68 and Ab65) specifically bind and immunoprecipitate viral particles from infected patients' sera with different HCV genotypes. In addition, both antibodies reduced mean viral load in HCV-Trimera mice. We have also shown that incubation of an infectious human serum with Ab68 or Ab65 prevented the serum's ability to infect human liver cells and human liver tissue.
 
The single antibody HepeX-C product candidate (Ab68) was tested in a pilot clinical program, which included:
 
* A Phase Ia/Ib Clinical Program in Patients with Chronic HCV, which demonstrated the safety and tolerability of using single and multi-doses of Ab 68 up to 120mg for a 28 day dosing period. In terms of efficacy, eight out of 25 patients had at least a 90% reduction in HCV-RNA levels from pre-treatment levels following administration of Ab68. These trials provided safety data, as well as a preliminary indication of anti-viral activity in humans.
 
*A Phase IIa Clinical Trial with Ab68 Following Liver Transplant, which demonstrated the safety and tolerability of Ab68 up to 240mg dosed for 12 weeks. Higher doses were not tested due to a clinical hold as a result of an intraoperative death of the first patient tested at the 480mg dose level (later determined by the medical examiner to be related to pulmonary emboli (blood clots in the lung)). The FDA later cleared the clinical hold, but we decided to discontinue the study and focus further development efforts on the dual anti-body product, XTL-6865. No other drug-related serious adverse events were reported during this study. The 120mg and 240mg dose groups had a significantly greater reduction in viral load than the placebo group during the first week when dosed daily. This effect was less evident when dosed less frequently than daily. This data provided additional evidence of anti-viral activity in immunosuppressed patients.
 
Based on this information, we had a pre-IND meeting with the FDA in October 2004 regarding XTL-6865, at which we presented data on Ab68 and Ab65, which had just successfully completed pre-clinical development. In April 2005, we submitted an IND to the FDA in order to commence a Phase Ia/Ib clinical trial later this year for XTL-6865, the dual-MAb product.
 
 
 
 
  icon paper stack View Older Articles   Back to Top   www.natap.org