Back grey_arrow_rt.gif
 
 
VA officials grilled over botched colonoscopies
 
 
  By BEN EVANS - 15 hours ago
 
WASHINGTON (AP) - Lawmakers sharply criticized the Veterans Affairs Department on Tuesday about why a national scare over botched colonoscopies earlier this year didn't prompt stronger safeguards at the agency's medical centers.
 
Agency officials apologized for the continued weaknesses and told a House subcommittee they would do better. VA Secretary Eric Shinseki said he would be disciplining staffers.
 
The strong reaction came as the agency's inspector general reported that fewer than half of VA facilities selected for surprise inspections last month had proper training and guidelines in place. That was months after the VA launched a nationwide safety campaign over the discovery of errors at facilities in Miami, Augusta, Ga., and Murfreesboro, Tenn., that could have exposed veterans to HIV and other infections.
 
John Daigh, VA's assistant inspector general who led the review, said the findings "troubled me greatly."
 
"We think there are systemic issues," Daigh said.
 
Providing new details on the mistakes found at Miami's center, for example, the report said workers there didn't know for almost five years that they should have been sterilizing an irrigation part on an endoscope used for routine colonoscopies. They also weren't cleaning a water tube between each procedure as recommended by the manufacturer and were mistakenly attaching the water system to the scope during the colonoscopy instead of before, possibly allowing contamination of sterile components.
 
The errors - all discovered after the hospital reported in January that it was using its equipment properly - illustrate the potential reach of the problem, not just at VA but in the private sector. Hospitals across the country are using different equipment, training and guidelines. Even as equipment changes, many staffers have continued using the same cleaning practices, James Bagian, VA's chief patient safety officer, said after the hearing.
 
"You don't know you're wrong until you know you're wrong," Bagian said when asked if the agency is confident that mistakes were limited to the three states that have reported problems.
 
In February, the VA began warning about 10,000 former patients in Georgia, Tennessee and Florida - some who had procedures as far back as 2003 - that they may have been exposed to infections. Although the VA says the chance of infection was remote, the patients were advised to get blood tests for HIV and hepatitis.
 
The agency says six veterans subsequently tested positive for HIV, 34 tested positive for hepatitis C and 13 tested positive for hepatitis B. But there is no way to prove whether the infections came from VA procedures, and some experts say most or all of the infections probably already existed.
 
The VA has said - through self-reporting from individual facilities - that it believes errors were limited to the centers in the three states. But the inspector general report suggests otherwise.
 
In surprise inspections at 42 randomly selected medical centers on May 13 and 14, investigators found that only 43 percent had standard operating procedures in place for the specific equipment in use and could show they properly trained their staffs for using the devices.
 
Lawmakers expressed disbelief that administrators hadn't immediately tightened procedures after the safety alert earlier this year.
 
"You certainly would think that after the initial discoveries and the directive from the VA that medical directors would make sure that all of their equipment and procedures were brought into line," said House Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman Bob Filner, D-Calif., who nonetheless praised the VA for being transparent. "There will be a public accounting of this situation."
 
VA officials struggled to explain the findings and said they would overhaul procedures so that medical centers follow more uniform practices.
 
After the hearing, Shinseki issued a statement calling it "unacceptable that any of our veterans may have been exposed to harm as a result of an endoscopic procedure."
 
Along with disciplining staff, he said he would require center directors to verify in writing that they are complying with guidelines.
 
Several top VA officials with experience at private hospitals said similar discoveries in the private sector would not have been publicized without specific knowledge that a patient was harmed.
 
Daigh said his investigators tried unsuccessfully to get information about potential problems at private hospitals, and several lawmakers said they think the problem probably extends beyond the VA.
 
"If this is happening in VA, what is happening ... in our greater health system?" asked Rep. Steve Buyer of Indiana, the top Republican on the committee.
 

VA clinic in Ga. was 1st to investigate
 
BY DORIE TURNER
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER
 
ATLANTA -- A Veterans Affairs clinic in Augusta was investigating improper sterilization of endoscopic equipment a month before a similar discovery in Tennessee set off a national review of VA cleaning procedures, a new federal report shows.
 
The ear, nose and throat clinic in Georgia was shuttered for seven days in November 2008 after a patient questioned how a nurse was cleaning the equipment she used for his throat endoscope, called a laryngoscope, according to a report released Tuesday by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs inspector general. The nurse expressed concerns to her superiors in June or July of 2008 about how the equipment was cleaned, according to the report.
 
A similar discovery at a Murfreesboro, Tenn., VA clinic a month later set off a nationwide safety campaign over sterilization errors that could have exposed more than 10,000 veterans to HIV and other infections at clinics in Georgia, Tennessee and Florida. The problems dated back as far as 2003.
 
Veterans who were treated at the Augusta clinic were not sent letters notifying them of the possible exposure until February 2009, four months after the initial problems were discovered, according to the VA Web site.
 
A spokeswoman for the VA medical center in Augusta referred calls to VA headquarters in Washington, D.C. In a statement, VA Secretary Eric Shinseki said the sterilization problems are "unacceptable."
 
"Our department will use the knowledge gained from these events to further improve our quality and safety standards for Veterans," he said.
 
Rebecca Wiley, director of the center in Augusta, said during a U.S. House Veterans Affairs subcommittee hearing Tuesday there were some discussions about the sterilization issue among lower-level staffers but that it never was communicated to her until later.
 
After the problems were first discovered in November, the VA medical center began an internal investigation and created a plan to notify veterans, according the report. Staff, including the Augusta nurse, were given extra training. The nurse told investigators that she came to the clinic in January 2008 but was never given training on how to sterilize equipment, the report states.
 
Oscar Sims, commander at an American Legion post in Augusta, said the lag between when the problems were discovered and when veterans were told was inexcusable.
 
"The veterans are what keep this country going the way we're going, and they ought to have the best care," said Sims, who served in Vietnam and Cuba with the Navy in the 1960s.
 
Follow-up blood checks of the majority of the affected veterans revealed six tested positive for HIV, 34 tested positive for hepatitis C and 13 tested positive for hepatitis B. But there is no way to prove that the infections came from VA procedures, and some experts say most or all of the infections probably already existed. The VA says the chance of infection was remote.
 
The report presented to the House Veterans Affairs subcommittee Tuesday shows that many clinics still haven't stepped up training and guidelines to ensure the endoscopic equipment is being handled properly. The findings suggest that errors in colonoscopies and other minimally invasive procedures performed at VA facilities may be more widespread than initially believed
 
 
 
 
  icon paper stack View Older Articles   Back to Top   www.natap.org