HIV Life Expectancy Study Published - pdf attached
Download the PDF here
"we modeled life expectancy after an HIV diagnosis using the life table approach"
from Jules: This modeling study suggests life expectancy for HIV+s diagnosed in the late nineties as not very good while other studies have been more encouraging and in fact many people who have been on HAART are doing much better by my estimation than this NIH sponsored study reflects, which I think misrepresents reality, not surprising for the NIH. I will report other studies. HOWEVER, life expectancy IS reduced in HIV at least in part due to accelerated aging due to HIV with studies finding senescence and activation causing inflammation as key culprits, still this issue has NOT been prioritized by the NIH while vaccines and global are prioritized by the NIH? Aging & HIV research needs to receive prioritization with set-aside dedicated funding and coordinated organized leadership, which it does not currently have, not to do this disrespects patients in the USA!
"Direct comparisons with previous estimates of life expectancy compared with the general population are difficult due to incompatibility of HIV populations studied [HIV diagnosed (used here) versus HIV patients in care or HIV seroconverters (used by others)]. However, a number of studies also reported the remaining excess mortality to be significant.9,12,15 Furthermore, we found that at older ages, the excess mortality persisted. For example, Bhaskaran et al12 reported that persons at least 45 years old had relatively low excess mortality, but we found that at age 60 years, AYLL was 11 years and even at age 70 years, it was still 8 years. This excess could be due to slower immune recovery after HAART initiation, late diagnosis among older age-groups, or factors related to therapy adherence.31,32 Braithwaite et al used computer modeling (simulation of patients in care) to estimate 20.4 years as the median survival, and Lohse et al10 estimated 32.5 years of survival for HIV-infected patients diagnosed and treated in HIV clinics during 2000-2005 compared with the 22.5-year life expectancy we estimated here.28....
.....Similarly, other studies that compared an HIV-infected population with the general population reported better survival or life expectancy7-9,12,15 than we reported here, but they were all populations of HIV-infected patients in care. Our population was one of HIV-diagnosed persons, regardless of care. Estimates based on patients in care likely overestimate (more than ours do) life expectancy in the general HIV-infected population. One study by Lai et al,33 which used NCHS mortality data, looked at potential gains in life expectancy after hypothetical elimination of HIV. They found a rapid reduction from 1987 to 2000 in burden of HIV on life expectancy, especially for black males of working age."
Life Expectancy After HIV Diagnosis Based on National HIV Surveillance Data From 25 States, United States
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes:
Harrison, Kathleen McDavid PhD, MPH; Song, Ruiguang PhD; Zhang, Xinjian PhD
From the Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Parts of the data were presented in a poster at the International AIDS Society meeting, August 4, 2008, Mexico City, Mexico.
Introduction: We estimate life expectancy and average years of life lost (AYLL) after an HIV diagnosis using population-based surveillance data from 25 states that have had name-based HIV surveillance since 1996.
Methods: We used US national HIV surveillance data (cases ≥13 years old) to model life expectancy after an HIV diagnosis using the life table approach. We then compared life expectancy at HIV diagnosis with that in the general population of the same age, sex, and race/ethnicity in the same calendar year using vital statistics data to estimate the AYLL due to an HIV diagnosis.
Results: Average life expectancy after HIV diagnosis increased from 10.5 to 22.5 years from 1996 to 2005. Life expectancy (years) was better for females than for males but improved less for females (females: 12.6-23.6 and males: 9.9-22.0). In 2005, life expectancy for black males was shortest, followed by Hispanic males and then white males. AYLL for cases diagnosed in 2005 was 21.1 years (males: 19.1 and females: 22.7) compared with 32.9 years in 1996.
Conclusions: Disparity in life expectancy for females and both black and Hispanic males, compared with males and white males, respectively, persists and should be addressed.
A total of 220,646 people were diagnosed with HIV in the 25 states from 1996 to 2005, and 10,366 deaths occurred among them by the end of 2007. Seventy-four percent of the infections occurred in males, 55% among blacks, 36% among whites, and 9% among Hispanics/Latinos (Table 1). Thirty-three percent had a first CD4 count <200 at or within 6 months after HIV diagnosis, 16% had a first CD4 count of at least 200 but not more than 499, 9% had a first CD4 count ≥500, and 42% had a missing CD4 count or 1 first measured more than 6 months after diagnosis. Among males, 67% were exposed through male-to-male sexual contact, 16% through IDU, 10% through HC, and 7% through male-to-male sexual contact and IDU. Seventy percent of females were exposed through HC and 29% through IDU; transmission category was unknown for 2%.
Average life expectancy after HIV diagnosis in 25 states increased from 10.5 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.4 to 10.6] to 22.5 years (95% CI: 22.2 to 22.7) from 1996 to 2005 (Table 2) and decreased with each increasing year of age at HIV diagnosis in 2005 (data not shown). Improvements in life expectancy were incremental each year except from 2000 to 2001, largely due to a decrease in life expectancy that year among females diagnosed with HIV infection. The largest 1-year increase was from 1996 to 1997 when HAART use was expanded. For each diagnosis year from 1997 to 2005, life expectancy was longer for females than for males and improved for both groups from 1996 to 2005 [12.6 (95% CI: 12.4 to 12.7) to 23.6 (95% CI: 23.0 to 24.2) years for females and 9.9 (95% CI: 9.8 to 10.0) to 22.0 (95% CI: 21.8 to 22.2) years for males] (Table 2).
Among males diagnosed in 2005, life expectancy was longest for white males, followed by Hispanic and then black males. Life expectancy improved less for black males [9.5 (95% CI: 9.4 to 9.7) to 19.9 (95% CI: 19.6 to 20.2) years] than for white males [10.3 (95% CI: 10.1 to 10.4) to 25.5 (95% CI: 24.9 to 26.1) years] and Hispanic males [10.1 (95% CI: 9.8 to 10.4) to 22.6 (95% CI: 21.9 to 23.3) years] from 1996 to 2005 (Table 3). Annual increases in life expectancy were experienced by black males, whereas among Hispanic males, improvement in life expectancy was not monotonic.
Due to a limited number of HIV diagnoses among white and Hispanic females, results of their estimated life expectancies are not stable. Overall, Hispanics and whites had similar life expectancy in the more recent years, and black females had the shortest life expectancy after HIV diagnosis. Improvements were not very significant for Hispanic and white females diagnosed in the last 5 years from 2001 to 2005. During this period, the average life expectancy was 20.6 years for black females (8-year increase from 1996), 22.1 years for white females (9-year increase), and 24.2 years for Hispanic females (13-year increase) (Table 3).
For each year from 1997 to 2004, males with male-to-male sex had the longest life expectancy among transmission categories. For those diagnosed in 2005, there was no significant difference among males in life expectancy between transmission categories male-to-male sex [28.3 (95% CI: 27.4 to 29.2) years] and male-to-male sex and IDU [24.6 (95% CI: 20.6 to 28.7) years] (Table 4). For females diagnosed in 2005 and in the HC transmission category had almost double the life expectancy [29.6 (95% CI: 27.9 to 31.3) years] of females in the IDU category [15.9 (95% CI: 15.1 to 16.6) years]. Each year after 1996, females in the HC category had roughly a 10-year longer life expectancy than those in the IDU category. Injection drug users, both male and female, had the worst life expectancy among all transmission categories for each year of the 10-year period.
Life expectancy increased almost 4-fold (5.5-19.4 years) among HIV-diagnosed persons from 1996 to 2005 with a first CD4 count at or within 6 months after diagnosis <200 (Table 2). Improvement in life expectancy over the 10-year period was even greater for persons with a CD4 count of <500 but at least 200 from 6.6 to 21.1 years.
Compared with the general US population (assuming that the standard error of life expectancy for the general population is approximately 0), AYLL among the HIV-diagnosed population in 25 states in 2005 was 21.1 (95% CI: 20.9 to 21.3) years, with AYLL among males 19.1 (95% CI: 18.9 to 19.3) and females 22.7 (95% CI: 22.1 to 23.3). Among males diagnosed with HIV infection in 2005, AYLL was 25.6, 18.1, and 10.2 for diagnoses at age 20, 40, and 60 years, respectively (Fig. 1). Among females diagnosed with HIV in 2005, AYLL was 30.7, 20.9, and 11.3 for diagnoses at age 20, 40, and 60 years, respectively. Whites diagnosed with HIV in 2005 had fewest AYLL compared with blacks and Hispanics at 20, 40, and 60 years [24.4, 16.9, and 9.3 (whites); 26.4, 18.1, and 10.1 (blacks); and 30.2, 23.3, and 15.3 (Hispanics)] (Fig. 2).
Based on population-based HIV surveillance data from 25 states, life expectancy after an HIV diagnosis has improved significantly (12 years) from 1996 to 2005, particularly in the first 5 years after the introduction of HAART. Significant improvements were also experienced among all race/ethnic groups and by both males (12 years) and females (11 years). Over the 10-year period, life expectancy increased 15 years for white males, 13 years for Hispanic males, and 10 years for black males. Improvements were not significant for Hispanic and white females diagnosed in the last 5 years (2001-2005). During this period, it is noteworthy that among females, the improvement in life expectancy was greatest for Hispanics. Also to be celebrated are the overall increases in life expectancy. Unfortunately, disparity in life expectancy for black and Hispanic males, compared with white males, persists. Concerning the Healthy People Objectives,4 improvements in life expectancy continue and are significant but disparities in race/ethnicity and sex continue to be of concern.
Life expectancy was worse for persons diagnosed at a later stage of disease (CD4 count <200) compared with all HIV-diagnosed persons. Late diagnoses may be due to poor access to testing or rapid progression of disease. Persons who know that they are HIV infected report fewer behavioral risk factors; therefore, prevention efforts aimed at increased testing and diagnosis should be augmented, and support for proven effective interventions should continue.24
Injection drug users had lower life expectancy consistent with their well-documented higher risk of death,12 which not only may be due to access and adherence obstacles but also may be related to prevalence of mental health, substance abuse, and comorbid conditions, including hepatitis C infection, in this population.12,25-27
Females had more AYLL than males, but, on average, females also live longer than males. AYLL was higher at younger ages due to the natural age-dependent increase in mortality. HIV-related mortality is decreasing, and this population is dying from causes similar to those of the same age-group in the general population.28,29 Hispanics had more AYLL than both blacks and whites, with the difference between Hispanics and blacks increasing at older ages. Hispanics have some of the highest rates of discontinuation of treatment and present very late to care,30 which may account for premature deaths.
Direct comparisons with previous estimates of life expectancy compared with the general population are difficult due to incompatibility of HIV populations studied [HIV diagnosed (used here) versus HIV patients in care or HIV seroconverters (used by others)]. However, a number of studies also reported the remaining excess mortality to be significant.9,12,15 Furthermore, we found that at older ages, the excess mortality persisted. For example, Bhaskaran et al12 reported that persons at least 45 years old had relatively low excess mortality, but we found that at age 60 years, AYLL was 11 years and even at age 70 years, it was still 8 years. This excess could be due to slower immune recovery after HAART initiation, late diagnosis among older age-groups, or factors related to therapy adherence.31,32 Braithwaite et al used computer modeling (simulation of patients in care) to estimate 20.4 years as the median survival, and Lohse et al10 estimated 32.5 years of survival for HIV-infected patients diagnosed and treated in HIV clinics during 2000-2005 compared with the 22.5-year life expectancy we estimated here.28
Similarly, other studies that compared an HIV-infected population with the general population reported better survival or life expectancy7-9,12,15 than we reported here, but they were all populations of HIV-infected patients in care. Our population was one of HIV-diagnosed persons, regardless of care. Estimates based on patients in care likely overestimate (more than ours do) life expectancy in the general HIV-infected population. One study by Lai et al,33 which used NCHS mortality data, looked at potential gains in life expectancy after hypothetical elimination of HIV. They found a rapid reduction from 1987 to 2000 in burden of HIV on life expectancy, especially for black males of working age.
The difference in life expectancy narrowed from 1996 to 2005 and from age 13 to age 70 years in 2005 in these 25 states. However, excess mortality (AYLL 21 years in 2005) remains in the HIV-diagnosed population compared with the US general population. In addition to their infections, HIV-infected persons may also differ from the general population on behavioral risk factors and socioeconomic factors, both of which can impact mortality and may account for some of the excess mortality reported here. HIV-infected persons have been found to smoke, consume alcohol, and inject drugs and are infected with hepatitis C at higher rates than the general population.34-39
US national HIV surveillance data routinely undergo data quality procedures related to elimination of duplicate reports, completeness and timeliness of reporting, and validity of dates of diagnosis and death. Using population-based surveillance data of the HIV-diagnosed population, we present a realistic representation of life expectancy in the HIV-diagnosed population in 25 states. To our knowledge, these estimates have not been previously provided.
These results can guide clinician communication with patients about their life expectancies after HIV diagnosis and policy makers and researchers to estimate costs and allocate resources. These estimates of life expectancy and AYLL can be added to the tools providers use to help guide discussions with patients. They also can be useful for individual planning and establishing general expectations as they help to provide a more complete picture of burden from HIV infection, along with other measures, for example, absolute or relative measures of mortality that are abundant in the literature.
Our estimates overcome some limitations of a similar cohort analysis; however, we note that HIV surveillance data are subject to several limitations. Although our data were from the largest set of population-based data from 1996 currently available for persons infected with HIV, the 25 states used in this analysis are not nationally representative. The data represent 27% of all AIDS cases diagnosed among adults and adolescents in the United States during 1996-2005. Data from states with high AIDS morbidity (eg, California and New York) were not included, which may have resulted in an over- or underrepresentation of cases among blacks and Hispanics. Blacks accounted for 49% and Hispanics 18% of AIDS cases from 1996 to 2005, whereas in the data used here from 25 states, blacks comprised 55% and Hispanics 9%.
Second, HIV surveillance data are subject to local variations in reporting and data quality. Also, HIV surveillance data do not include individuals tested anonymously or HIV-infected individuals who have not been tested. It is estimated that persons infected with HIV but not yet tested represented about 21% of the total HIV-infected population in the United States in 2006.40
Death reporting timeliness varies from state to state. Because there are delays in death reporting, data have been adjusted for death reporting delays. However, these life expectancy estimates may still be over- or underestimates of true life expectancy. Finally, these results are not adjusted for coinfection with hepatitis C virus or other comorbid conditions, or for treatment, none of which is collected by the surveillance system.
Although life expectancy and AYLL have significantly improved for persons diagnosed from 1996 to 2005 in 25 states, life expectancy remains shorter than that for the general US population and sex and race/ethnic disparities persist. Ongoing monitoring of life expectancy is important as therapies advance and other variables (eg, antiretroviral resistance, toxicities, adherence, and HIV testing practices) have the potential to change as well.41,42 AYLL can be used in conjunction with other measures of HIV disease burden, for example, mortality and survival rates, to provide policy makers, clinicians, and patients a more comprehensive picture of burden to the HIV-infected individual. As additional data become available in the national HIV surveillance system, better assessment of how well collective efforts have affected (lengthened) life expectancy for HIV-diagnosed persons will be possible.
Given the findings, further promotion of testing initiatives43 and opt-out testing will be paramount to increasing the proportion of persons who are aware of their HIV infections and who then reduce behavioral risk factors to slow the transmission of HIV. Programs aimed at increasing access to care of HIV-infected persons may improve the proportion of persons being treated and thus lengthen survival.
We used US national HIV surveillance data from 25 states with name-based HIV surveillance since 1996. States included in the analysis were Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. HIV diagnoses among adults and adolescents (≥13 years) from 1996 through 2005 with follow-up through 2007 and reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) without identifying information through June 2008 were included. Deaths were included irrespective of cause of death. HIV surveillance data were collected as part of routine practices as mandated by state and local laws or regulations. The CDC determined that HIV surveillance is not a research activity and therefore does not require review by an institutional review board. The CDC used its Guidelines for Defining Public Health Research and Public Health Non-Research16 and Title 45 Part 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations17 to make its determination.
We modeled life expectancy after an HIV diagnosis using the life table approach.18 The period life table method estimates life expectancy of a hypothetical cohort by assuming that those at a given age in future years would have the same age-specific death rates as those at the same age in the current year. We used an exponential model to estimate the age-specific death rates. Because the death rate within 1 year after HIV diagnosis is quite different from that more than 1 year after HIV diagnosis, we estimated the age-specific death rates separately for death within 1 year after HIV diagnosis and for that more than 1 year after HIV diagnosis (Song R, PhD, Qin G, PhD, McDavid Harrison K, PhD, MPH, et al. Modeling survival after AIDS diagnosis based on National AIDS Surveillance Data, unpublished data, May 2009). In addition, data were adjusted for case and death reporting delay19 and missing risk factors.20
We then compared life expectancy of a person after HIV diagnosis with that of a person in the general population with the same age, sex, and race/ethnicity in the same calendar year using mortality data from the general population18 to estimate the AYLL after HIV diagnosis. US National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) vital statistics data were used to prepare race/ethnic life tables using age-, sex-, race-, and calendar year-specific death rates, with race/ethnicity categories consistent with those in HIV surveillance data [white, black/African American (black), Hispanic/Latino (Hispanic)]. Numbers of American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander were small and produced unstable estimates; therefore, these groups' results were not presented. Numerators for death rates were obtained from mortality data from the NCHS for 2005.21 Population denominators for death rates were based on bridged-race intercensal estimates for 2005.22 The death rate was modeled as a function of age and estimated using cross-sectional data observed in a specific calendar year from 1996 to 2005.
The AYLL was calculated as the difference between life expectancy by age in the general and the HIV-diagnosed populations. Estimates of life expectancy by sex, race/ethnicity, CD4+ T-lymphocyte count at or within 6 months after diagnosis [AIDS opportunistic infection or CD4 count <200 cells/µL or percent <14 (stage 3), 200≤ CD4 count <500 cells/µL or 14≤ CD4 percent <27 (stage 2), CD4 count ≥500 or CD4 percent ≥27 (stage 1), and other or missing CD4 count],23 and HIV transmission category [male-to-male sex, injection drug use (IDU), male-to-male sex and IDU, and high-risk heterosexual contact (HC) (with a sex partner known to have, or to be at high risk for, HIV infection, eg, a man who has sex with men or an injection drug user)] are presented along with figures of AYLL by sex and race/ethnicity.