icon star paper   HIV Articles  
Back grey_arrow_rt.gif
 
 
PPAR{gamma}-mediated insulin sensitization: the importance of fat versus muscle
 
 
  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288: E287-E291, 2005
 
Ulrich Kintscher1 and Ronald E. Law2
 
1Center for Cardiovascular Research, Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Campus Charité-Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and 2Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., Lincolnshire, Illinois
 
ABSTRACT
 
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} (PPAR{gamma}) is a nuclear hormone receptor that functions as a transcriptional regulator in a variety of tissues. PPAR{gamma} activation, e.g., through binding of the synthetic glitazones or thiazolidinediones (TZD), results in a marked improvement in type 2 diabetic patients of insulin and glucose parameters resulting from an improvement of whole body insulin sensitivity. The role of different metabolic tissues (fat, skeletal muscle, liver) in mediating PPAR{gamma} function in glucose and insulin homeostasis is still unclear. Recently, the function of PPAR{gamma} in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle has been intensively characterized by using targeted deletion of PPAR{gamma} in those tissues. In those studies, adipose PPAR{gamma} has been identified as an essential mediator for the maintainance of whole body insulin sensitivity. Two major mechanisms have been described. 1) Adipose PPAR{gamma} protects nonadipose tissue against excessive lipid overload and maintains normal organ function (liver, skeletal muscle); and 2) adipose PPAR{gamma} guarantees a balanced and adequate production of secretion from adipose tissue of adipocytokines such as adiponectin and leptin, which are important mediators of insulin action in peripheral tissues. In contrast to studies in adipose-specific PPAR{gamma}-deficient mice, the data in muscle-specific PPAR{gamma}--/-- mice demonstrate that whole body insulin sensitivity is, at least in part, relying on an intact PPAR{gamma} system in skeletal muscle. Finally, these early and elegant studies using tissue-specific PPAR{gamma} knockout mouse models pinpoint adipose tissue as the major target of TZD-mediated improvement of hyperlipidemia and insulin sensitization.
 
ARTICLE TEXT
 
PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED RECEPTOR-{gamma} (PPAR{gamma}) belongs to the family of PPARs, which also includes the isoforms PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{delta} (16). The PPAR{gamma} gene gives rise to at least three mRNAs, PPAR{gamma}1, PPAR{gamma}2, and PPAR{gamma}3, that differ at their 5' end as a consequence of alternate promoter usage and splicing (2). Proteins produced from PPAR{gamma}1 and -{gamma}3 mRNAs are identical, whereas the PPAR{gamma}2 protein contains an additional NH2-terminal region composed of 30 amino acids (2). PPAR{gamma}1 is expressed at substantial levels in cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage, where it plays a pivotal role in regulating gene expression involved in lipid metabolism and inflammation (31). PPAR{gamma}2 expression is abundant in, and primarily restricted to, adipose tissue. (2) However, low levels of PPAR{gamma}2 expression have been described in PMA- and TGF-{beta}-stimulated monocytes (11, 12).
 
PPAR{gamma}, after heterodimerizing with the retinoid X receptor, is activated by binding certain synthetic ligands, known as insulin sensitizers, glitazones, or thiazolidinediones (TZDs), clinically used in oral antidiabetic therapy (3). In addition, multiple endogenous ligands have been identified, including fatty acids and fatty acid derivatives such as 15-deoxy-{Delta}12,14-prostaglandin J2 (3). After ligand activation, PPAR{gamma} changes its conformational structure, which facilitates the release of corepressors and subsequent binding of a distinct set of nuclear coactivators, resulting in the regulation of gene transcription (2, 6).
 
PPAR{gamma} activation through binding of the synthetic TZDs results in a marked improvement in type 2 diabetic patients of insulin and glucose parameters resulting from an improvement of whole body insulin sensitivity (4, 21, 24, 28). The mechanism of PPAR{gamma}-mediated insulin sensitization by TZDs is still unclear. Despite the importance of skeletal muscle in insulin-induced glucose disposal, adipose tissue seems to be the major mediator of PPAR{gamma} action on insulin sensitivity. PPAR{gamma} has the highest expression levels in adipose tissue compared with other metabolic organs, such as skeletal muscle, liver, and pancreas (36). PPAR{gamma} is the master regulator of adipogenesis, thereby stimulating the production of small insulin-sensitive adipocytes (15, 35). The induction of adipogenesis associated with the capability for fatty acid trapping has been shown to be an important contributor to the maintainance of systemic insulin sensitivity. (33) In addition, PPAR{gamma} activation in mature adipoyctes induces a number of genes involved in the insulin-signaling cascade, thereby improving insulin sensitivity (20, 30, 34). However, there is still debate about the role of other metabolic tissues in mediating PPAR{gamma}-function in glucose and insulin homeostasis. Recently, the function of PPAR{gamma} in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle has been intensively characterized by using targeted deletion of PPAR{gamma} in those tissues.
 
PPAR{gamma} FUNCTION: LESSONS FROM TISSUE-SPECIFIC KNOCKOUT MICE
 
PPAR{gamma} Deficiency in Fat
 
A study by He et al. (8) utilized the Cre-recombinase-loxP system to generate mice with PPAR{gamma} deficiency only in fat. As a result of the LoxP site location on either side of exons 1 and 2 of the PPAR{gamma} gene, a complete loss of the PPAR{gamma}1 isoform and translation of a nonfunctional PPAR{gamma}2 isoform were achieved after Cre-mediated deletion. Placement of Cre cDNA under the control of the adipose-specific fatty acid-binding protein (aP2) promoter resulted in fat-specific deletion of PPAR{gamma}. aP2 is a downstream target of PPAR{gamma} during adipocyte differentiation (13). Usage of the aP2 promoter, therefore, deletes PPAR{gamma} after normal differentiation in adipocytes. This strategy allows one to study the role of PPAR{gamma}-mediated functions in mature adipocytes, but not during the early processes of adipogenesis.
 
Mice carrying the deletion of PPAR{gamma} in mature adipocytes showed a marked decrease of brown and white adipose mass, with >80% loss of white adipocytes (8). Adipocyte loss was compensated for by a hypertrophic response of the remaining adipocytes and an inflammatory reaction in adipose tissue (8). Metabolic measurements in adipose PPAR{gamma}-deficient mice demonstrated marked hyperlipidemia with elevated free fatty acid (FFA) and trigylceride levels, associated with a significant decrease in plasma adipocytokines (leptin, adiponectin). Despite these metabolic changes, systemic insulin sensitivity was maintained with no changes in fasting glucose and insulin levels, as well as no changes in glucose and insulin tolerance tests. However, adipocyte PPAR{gamma} was required to maintain insulin sensitivity in mice fed a high-fat diet. Insulin responsiveness of different metabolic organs, including adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and liver, was tested in clamp studies under normal chow diet. These experiments revealed the presence of adipose tissue and hepatic insulin resistance, whereas muscle insulin sensitivity was maintained. Liver insulin resistance was a result of hepatic lipid accummulation (8).
 
TZD treatment in patients results in prominent improvement of whole body insulin sensitivity; however, the targeted metabolic tissue responsible for these effects is still unknown (4, 21, 28). To further clarify the insulin-sensitizing mechanism of TZDs, adipose PPAR{gamma}-deficient and control mice were treated with rosiglitazone (8). TZD treatment lowered FFA levels in control mice, which was not observed in adipocyte PPAR{gamma}- deficient mice, indicating that TZD-mediated regulation of plasma FFAs is dependent on PPAR{gamma} function in intact adipose tissue. Hepatic insulin resistance was not affected by TZD treatment.
 
Previous studies in fatless and lipodystrophic animal models revealed the development of systemic insulin resistance and diabetes. Surgical reimplantation of adipose tissue reversed the diabetic state in those animals, underscoring the importance of adipose tissue in maintaining insulin and glucose homeostasis (5, 22). Lack of PPAR{gamma} in mature adipocytes did impair insulin sensitivity under high-fat diet conditions, a nutritional environment prevalent in industrialized countries and rising in developing nations (8). Against the background of this epidemic in overnutrition, the importance of adipose PPAR{gamma} in maintaining intact systemic insulin sensitivity is evident from the study by He et al. (8). Impaired PPAR{gamma} function in fat resulted in hepatic insulin resistance. Unfortunately, muscle insulin sensitivity has not yet been evaluated in adipose PPAR{gamma}-deficient mice fed a high-fat diet. A further increase in FFA accumulation in skeletal muscle in response to a high-fat diet should also contribute to muscular insulin resistance. PPAR{gamma} deficiency in adipocytes also demonstrated that adipose tissue is a major mediator of TZD effects to decrease circulating FFAs by inhibiting lipolysis in fat. This mechanism is likely a major contributor to TZD insulin-sensitizing activity (17, 26, 27). Although the elegant work of He et al. provided important insight concerning the role of PPAR{gamma} function in mature adipocytes, it did not examine the role of this nuclear receptor in producing new insulin-sensitive, small adipocytes.
 
What is the role of PPAR{gamma} during the initiation of adipoycte differentiation? Koutnikova et al. (14) utilized a complex approach by introducing a genomic modification near exon B (introduction of a neomycin cassette 500 bp downstream) of the PPAR{gamma}2 isoform. The sole presence of the selection marker in proximity to exon B resulted in an almost complete loss of PPAR{gamma}2 in brown and white adipose tissue, as well as in liver and muscle. PPAR{gamma}1 is a downstream target of PPAR{gamma}2 during differentiation of white adipocytes, so it was not surprising that the PPAR{gamma}1 isoform was also undetectable in white adipose tissue (29, 32). In contrast, in brown adipose tissue the loss of PPAR{gamma}2 was compensated for by an increase in PPAR{gamma}1 expression. PPAR{gamma}1 mRNA expression level in muscle and liver remained unchanged. Because PPAR{gamma}2 is expressed predominantly in white adipose tissue, this model serves as an adipose-specific PPAR{gamma} knockdown.
 
One-week-old animals homozygous for the mutation had no white adipose tissue associated with a massive hepatomegaly due to steatosis and accummulation of lipids in heart, skeletal muscle, and kidneys (14). Serum FFA and triglyceride levels were dramatically elevated in young lypodystrophic animals. Adult mice showed significantly higher glucose levels during a glucose tolerance test, as well as increased glucose and insulin levels during regular feeding, indicating a state of insulin resistance in these animals. Serum FFA and triglyceride levels were decreased during adulthood in PPAR{gamma} adipose tissue knockdown mice despite their remaining lypodystrophic. Decreased plasma triglyceride and FFA levels likely resulted from a compensatory increase in FFA catabolism in skeletal muscle, since multiple genes involved in FFA oxidation were induced in muscle tissue of mutant animals. {beta}-Oxidation genes in the liver, however, remained unchanged, and genes for hepatic gluconeogenesis were induced. These together led the authors to the conclusion that, in the absence of white adipose tissue, PPAR{gamma} in the liver contributes to impaired glucose tolerance, whereas the muscle might be a major compensatory organ for lipid metabolism (14).
 
Zhang et al. (38) selectively disrupted the PPAR{gamma}2 isoform in mice by replacing the initiation codon and the partial exon B with a red fluorescence protein-coding sequence and the neomycin gene cassette. PPAR{gamma}2 deletion resulted in a marked reduction of white adipose tissue mass, whereas brown adipose tissue mass was normal (38). PPAR{gamma}2-deficient mice had impaired insulin sensitivity, as measured in an insulin tolerance test. However, insulin sensitivity was impaired only in male mice, not in female animals, suggesting a sex-specific regulation of PPAR{gamma}2-dependent insulin and glucose metabolism (38). Surprisingly, in the study by Zhang et al., lypodystrophy in PPAR{gamma}2-deficient mice did not result in lipid accumulation in nonadipose tissue (e.g., liver), and circulating triglyceride and cholesterol levels were equal among the groups. In addition, food intake and body weight were similar between wild-type and PPAR{gamma}2-deficient mice, and one has to ask where incorporated substrates (carbohydrates, fatty acids, etc.) are stored in lypodystrophic PPAR{gamma}2-deficient mice. Treatment of PPAR{gamma}2-deficient mice with the PPAR{gamma} ligand rosiglitazone still led to a normalization of systemic insulin resistance, suggesting that PPAR{gamma}2 is not essential for TZD-mediated insulin sensitization in this model (38).
 
What Have We Learned from PPAR{gamma} Deficiency in Fat?
 
The three studies discussed demonstrated that PPAR{gamma} is essential for the development and normal function of white adipose tissue (8, 14, 38). They have elegantly shown that PPAR{gamma} is required to keep up intact insulin sensitivity during caloric intake, even gaining importance during intake of high-fat diets. Certain mechanisms of the maintainance of insulin sensitivity through adipose PPAR{gamma} have been identified. By maintaining the intact function of white adipose tissue, PPAR{gamma} protects the liver against lipid overload, thereby ensuring intact hepatic insulin sensitivity. Adipose PPAR{gamma} guarantees a balanced and adequate regulation of secretion from adipose tissue of adipocytokines such as adiponectin and leptin, which are major contributors to a regular insulin response (7, 10, 19, 37). The role of skeletal muscle during these processes still remains unclear. Previous studies have shown that lypodystrophic or fatless animals develop severe insulin resistance and diabetes, mainly as a result of impaired muscular glucose diposal due to lipid accummulation and subsequent lipotoxicity (22, 27). However, He et al. (8) obeserved an intact insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscle of adipose PPAR{gamma}-deficient mice despite a marked accummulation of lipids. They hypothesized that a certain threshold of lipid accumulation must be reached in skeletal muscle to induce lipotoxic insulin resistance in skeletal muscle. This threshold is likely to be attained during intake of high-fat diets. Unfortunately, the authors did not perform these experiments in their study. In addition, Koutnikova et al. (14) demonstrated that the loss of PPAR{gamma} induced the expression of genes involved in muscular {beta}-oxidation, thereby providing a compensatory enhanced FFA catabolism in skeletal muscle, contributing to the clearance of FFAs (23). Compensatory FFA catabolism, however, did not affect the insulin-resistant state in mutant animals (14). In addition, despite a decrease in serum FFA levels in adult animals, FFA serum levels were still elevated during caloric intake (14). Finally, increased muscular FFA oxidation could not prevent lipid accummulation in skeletal muscle of mutant animals, assuming the continued presence of lipotoxic impairment of muscular glucose metabolism (14). Further experiments are required to characterize the role of compensatory muscular FFA oxidation in the regulation of whole body lipid and glucose metabolism after adipocytic PPAR{gamma} loss.
 
In summary, two major mechanisms of adipose PPAR{gamma}-mediated preservation of systemic insulin sensitivity have been identified: 1) protection of nonadipose tissue against excessive lipid overload and maintainance of regular organ function (liver, skeletal muscle), and 2) balanced and adequate regulation of adipocytokine secretion (adiponectin, leptin).
 
Although PPAR{gamma} expressed in liver and skeletal muscle contributes importantly to glucose and lipid metabolism, these early and elegant studies using tissue-specific PPAR{gamma} knockout mouse models pinpoint adipose tissue as the major target of TZD-mediated improvement of hyperlipidemia and insulinsensitization (8, 14).
 
PPAR{gamma} Deficiency in Skeletal Muscle
 
To further study the role of skeletal muscle in PPAR{gamma}-mediated regulation of insulin and glucose metabolism, Hevener et al. (9), as well as Norris et al. (25), produced mice with a skeletal muscle-specific deletion of PPAR{gamma}. LoxP sites flanked exon 1 and/or 2 of the PPAR{gamma}, and Cre mice were carrying the Cre recombinase under the control of the muscle-specific muscle creatine kinase promoter (9, 25).
 
Mice deficient for PPAR{gamma} in skeletal muscle had significant whole body insulin resistance demonstrated either by insulin/glucose tolerance tests or by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp studies (9, 25). However, the etiology of impaired insulin action in these mice remains to be defined. Hevener et al. (9) postulated that loss of PPAR{gamma} resulted in skeletal muscle insulin resistance followed by impaired insulin action in adipose tissue and liver. In contrast, Norris et al. (25) did not observe a change in muscular glucose disposal, whereas hepatic insulin sensitivity was impaired. Finally, the authors of both studies investigated the effects of TZDs in their model. TZD treatment did markedly improve systemic parameters of insulin sensitization independently of muscular PPAR{gamma} deficiency, once again underscoring the importance for adipose tissue and liver for TZD actions (9, 25).
 
WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM PPAR{gamma} DEFICIENCY IN FAT AND SKELETAL MUSCLE?
 
In contrast to the studies in adipose-specific PPAR{gamma}-deficient mice, the data in muscle-specific PPAR{gamma}--/-- mice demonstrate that whole body insulin sensitivity is, at least in part, dependent on an intact PPAR{gamma} system in skeletal muscle (Table 1). Despite the fact that PPAR{gamma} expression in muscle is only 5--10% of its expression in adipose tissue, PPAR{gamma} seems to play a central in role in maintaining regular insulin-mediated signaling in muscle, resulting in normal glucose disposal (1, 18, 36). In addition, the studies by Hevener et al. (9) and Norris et al. (25) demonstrated that PPAR{gamma} deficiency in muscle results in secondary insulin resistance in adipose tissue and liver. These data suggest the existence of an important endocrine cross talk among muscle, fat, and liver, whose communicating molecules remain to be identified.
 
With respect to the pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus, all studies in tissue-specific PPAR{gamma} knockout mice, except the study by Zhang et al. (38), in which only PPAR{gamma}2 was knocked out, have demonstrated that adipose tissue is the major primary target of TZD-induced insulin sensitization (8, 9, 14, 25).
 
In conclusion, recent studies in tissue-specific PPAR{gamma} knockout mice have greatly increased our understanding of the role of different metabolic tissues in PPAR{gamma}-mediated regulation of systemic insulin-stimulated glucose metabolism. The importance of adipose PPAR{gamma} to maintain systemic insulin sensitivity has convincingly been demonstrated. PPAR{gamma}-mediated adipogenesis plays an important role in the protection against nonadipose tissue insulin resistance. Surprisingly, a small amount of muscular PPAR{gamma} contributes to intact systemic insulin sensitivity by maintaining intact insulin-mediated glucose utilization in muscle. Future studies are required to characterize the molecular network involved in the endocrine cross talk among fat, muscle, and liver.
 
REFERENCES
 
1. Braissant O, Foufelle F, Scotto C, Dauca M, and Wahli W. Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): tissue distribution of PPAR-alpha, -beta, and -gamma in the adult rat. Endocrinology 137: 354--366, 1996.[Abstract]
2. Desvergne B and Wahli W. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: nuclear control of metabolism. Endocr Rev 20: 649--688, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Forman BM, Tontonoz P, Chen J, Brun RP, Spiegelman BM, and Evans RM. 15-Deoxy-delta 12, 14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPAR gamma. Cell 83: 803--812, 1995.[ISI][Medline]
4. Frias JP, Yu JG, Kruszynska YT, and Olefsky JM. Metabolic effects of troglitazone therapy in type 2 diabetic, obese, and lean normal subjects. Diabetes Care 23: 64--69, 2000.[Abstract]
5. Gavrilova O, Marcus-Samuels B, Graham D, Kim JK, Shulman GI, Castle AL, Vinson C, Eckhaus M, and Reitman ML. Surgical implantation of adipose tissue reverses diabetes in lipoatrophic mice. J Clin Invest 105: 271--278, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Glass CK and Rosenfeld MG. The coregulator exchange in transcriptional functions of nuclear receptors. Genes Dev 14: 121--141, 2000.[Free Full Text]
7. Havel PJ. Control of energy homeostasis and insulin action by adipocyte hormones: leptin, acylation stimulating protein, and adiponectin. Curr Opin Lipidol 13: 51--59, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
8. He W, Barak Y, Hevener A, Olson P, Liao D, Le J, Nelson M, Ong E, Olefsky JM, and Evans RM. Adipose-specific peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma knockout causes insulin resistance in fat and liver but not in muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 15712--15717, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Hevener AL, He W, Barak Y, Le J, Bandyopadhyay G, Olson P, Wilkes J, Evans RM, and Olefsky J. Muscle-specific Pparg deletion causes insulin resistance. Nat Med 9: 1491--1497, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
10. Hsueh WA and Law R. The central role of fat and effect of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma on progression of insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol 92: 3J--9J, 2003.[ISI][Medline]
11. Jackson SM, Parhami F, Xi XP, Berliner JA, Hsueh WA, Law RE, and Demer LL. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor activators target human endothelial cells to inhibit leukocyte-endothelial cell interaction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19: 2094--2104, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Kintscher U, Wakino S, Bruemmer D, Goetze S, Graf K, Hsueh W, and Law R. TGF-beta(1) induces peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma1 and gamma2 expression in human THP-1 monocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 297: 794, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
13. Koutnikova H and Auwerx J. Regulation of adipocyte differentiation. Ann Med 33: 556--561, 2001.[ISI][Medline]
14. Koutnikova H, Cock TA, Watanabe M, Houten SM, Champy MF, Dierich A, and Auwerx J. Compensation by the muscle limits the metabolic consequences of lipodystrophy in PPAR gamma hypomorphic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 14457--14462, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Kubota N, Terauchi Y, Miki H, Tamemoto H, Yamauchi T, Komeda K, Satoh S, Nakano R, Ishii C, Sugiyama T, Eto K, Tsubamoto Y, Okuno A, Murakami K, Sekihara H, Hasegawa G, Naito M, Toyoshima Y, Tanaka S, Shiota K, Kitamura T, Fujita T, Ezaki O, Aizawa S, and Kadowaki T. PPAR gamma mediates high-fat diet-induced adipocyte hypertrophy and insulin resistance. Mol Cell 4: 597--609, 1999.[ISI][Medline]
16. Lee CH, Olson P, and Evans RM. Minireview. Lipid metabolism, metabolic diseases, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Endocrinology 144: 2201--2207, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Lewis GF, Carpentier A, Adeli K, and Giacca A. Disordered fat storage and mobilization in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Endocr Rev 23: 201--229, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Loviscach M, Rehman N, Carter L, Mudaliar S, Mohadeen P, Ciaraldi TP, Veerkamp JH, and Henry RR. Distribution of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in human skeletal muscle and adipose tissue: relation to insulin action. Diabetologia 43: 304--311, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
19. Maeda N, Shimomura I, Kishida K, Nishizawa H, Matsuda M, Nagaretani H, Furuyama N, Kondo H, Takahashi M, Arita Y, Komuro R, Ouchi N, Kihara S, Tochino Y, Okutomi K, Horie M, Takeda S, Aoyama T, Funahashi T, and Matsuzawa Y. Diet-induced insulin resistance in mice lacking adiponectin/ACRP30. Nat Med 8: 731--737, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
20. Maeda N, Takahashi M, Funahashi T, Kihara S, Nishizawa H, Kishida K, Nagaretani H, Matsuda M, Komuro R, Ouchi N, Kuriyama H, Hotta K, Nakamura T, Shimomura I, and Matsuzawa Y. PPARgamma ligands increase expression and plasma concentrations of adiponectin, an adipose-derived protein. Diabetes 50: 2094--2099, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Miyazaki Y, Mahankali A, Matsuda M, Glass L, Mahankali S, Ferrannini E, Cusi K, Mandarino LJ, and DeFronzo RA. Improved glycemic control and enhanced insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic subjects treated with pioglitazone. Diabetes Care 24: 710--719, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Moitra J, Mason MM, Olive M, Krylov D, Gavrilova O, Marcus-Samuels B, Feigenbaum L, Lee E, Aoyama T, Eckhaus M, Reitman ML, and Vinson C. Life without white fat: a transgenic mouse. Genes Dev 12: 3168--3181, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Muoio DM, Way JM, Tanner CJ, Winegar DA, Kliewer SA, Houmard JA, Kraus WE, and Dohm GL. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha regulates fatty acid utilization in primary human skeletal muscle cells. Diabetes 51: 901--909, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Nolan JJ, Ludvik B, Beerdsen P, Joyce M, and Olefsky J. Improvement in glucose tolerance and insulin resistance in obese subjects treated with troglitazone. N Engl J Med 331: 1188--1193, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Norris AW, Chen L, Fisher SJ, Szanto I, Ristow M, Jozsi AC, Hirshman MF, Rosen ED, Goodyear LJ, Gonzalez FJ, Spiegelman BM, and Kahn CR. Muscle-specific PPARgamma-deficient mice develop increased adiposity and insulin resistance but respond to thiazolidinediones. J Clin Invest 112: 608--618, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Perseghin G, Ghosh S, Gerow K, and Shulman GI. Metabolic defects in lean nondiabetic offspring of NIDDM parents: a cross-sectional study. Diabetes 46: 1001--1009, 1997.[Abstract]
27. Perseghin G, Scifo P, De Cobelli F, Pagliato E, Battezzati A, Arcelloni C, Vanzulli A, Testolin G, Pozza G, Del Maschio A, and Luzi L. Intramyocellular triglyceride content is a determinant of in vivo insulin resistance in humans: a 1H-13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment in offspring of type 2 diabetic parents. Diabetes 48: 1600--1606, 1999.[Abstract]
28. Raskin P, Rappaport EB, Cole ST, Yan Y, Patwardhan R, and Freed MI. Rosiglitazone short-term monotherapy lowers fasting and post-prandial glucose in patients with type II diabetes. Diabetologia 43: 278--284, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
29. Ren D, Collingwood TN, Rebar EJ, Wolffe AP, and Camp HS. PPARgamma knockdown by engineered transcription factors: exogenous PPARgamma2 but not PPARgamma1 reactivates adipogenesis. Genes Dev 16: 27--32, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Ribon V, Johnson JH, Camp HS, and Saltiel AR. Thiazolidinediones and insulin resistance: peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor gamma activation stimulates expression of the CAP gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 14751--14756, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Ricote M, Huang J, Fajas L, Li A, Welch J, Najib J, Witztum JL, Auwerx J, Palinski W, and Glass CK. Expression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) in human atherosclerosis and regulation in macrophages by colony stimulating factors and oxidized low density lipoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 7614--7619, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Saladin R, Fajas L, Dana S, Halvorsen YD, Auwerx J, and Briggs M. Differential regulation of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma1 (PPARgamma1) and PPARgamma2 messenger RNA expression in the early stages of adipogenesis. Cell Growth Differ 10: 43--48, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Shulman GI. Cellular mechanisms of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 106: 171--176, 2000.[Free Full Text]
34. Smith U, Gogg S, Johansson A, Olausson T, Rotter V, and Svalstedt B. Thiazolidinediones (PPARgamma agonists) but not PPARalpha agonists increase IRS-2 gene expression in 3T3--L1 and human adipocytes. FASEB J 15: 215--220, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Tontonoz P, Hu E, and Spiegelman BM. Stimulation of adipogenesis in fibroblasts by PPAR gamma 2, a lipid-activated transcription factor. Cell 79: 1147--1156, 1994.[ISI][Medline]
36. Vidal-Puig AJ, Considine RV, Jimenez-Linan M, Werman A, Pories WJ, Caro JF, and Flier JS. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene expression in human tissues. Effects of obesity, weight loss, and regulation by insulin and glucocorticoids. J Clin Invest 99: 2416--2422, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Yamauchi T, Kamon J, Ito Y, Tsuchida A, Yokomizo T, Kita S, Sugiyama T, Miyagishi M, Hara K, Tsunoda M, Murakami K, Ohteki T, Uchida S, Takekawa S, Waki H, Tsuno NH, Shibata Y, Terauchi Y, Froguel P, Tobe K, Koyasu S, Taira K, Kitamura T, Shimizu T, Nagai R, and Kadowaki T. Cloning of adiponectin receptors that mediate antidiabetic metabolic effects. Nature 423: 762--769, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
38. Zhang J, Fu M, Cui T, Xiong C, Xu K, Zhong W, Xiao Y, Floyd D, Liang J, Li E, Song Q, and Chen YE. Selective disruption of PPARgamma 2 impairs the development of adipose tissue and insulin sensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 10703--10708, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
 
 
 
 
 
  icon paper stack View Older Articles   Back to Top   www.natap.org