icon-    folder.gif   Conference Reports for NATAP  
 
  XIX International AIDS Conference
July 22-27, 2012
Washington, DC
Back grey_arrow_rt.gif
 
 
 
IMPAACT P1066: Raltegravir (RAL) safety and efficacy in HIV infected (+) youth 2 to 18 years of age through week 48
 
 
  Reported by Jules Levin
IAC Wash DC USA 2012 July 22-27
 
S. Nachman1, E. Acosta2, N. Zheng3, H. Teppler4, B. Homony4, X. Xu4, C. Alvero3, E. Handelsman5, C. Worrell6, B. Graham7, M. Toye8, E. Petzold9, A. Wiznia10, and the P1066 Group 1SUNY Stony Brook, Pediatrics, Stony Brook, United States; 2University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States; 3Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, United States; 4Merck, North Wales, United States; 5Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, United States; 6Natl Inst of Child Hlth and Human Devt, Bethesda, United States; 7Frontier Science Inc, Buffalo, United States; 8Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, United States; 9Social and Scientific Systems, Durham, United States; 10Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States

IAC1.gif

IAC2.gif

IAC3.gif

ABSTRACT
 
Background: New antiretrovirals are needed for HIV+ children. IMPAACT P1066 is a Phase I/II open label multicenter trial to evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, tolerability, and efficacy of multiple RAL formulations in treatment experienced HIV+ youth. RAL was given with an optimized background regimen. Dose selection was based upon intensive PK and safety data: 400 mg BID of RAL film-coated tablet (6-18 years) and weight-based dosing (~6mg/kg BID) of RAL chewable tablet (2 to < 12 years). Here we present safety and efficacy results at 24 and 48 weeks in the 96 subjects who received the selected RAL dose.
 
Methods: Subjects were stratified sequentially in 3 age cohorts (I, 12-18 years; II, 6-< 12 years; III, 2-< 6 years); Cohort I enrolled first. Safety data through Week 48 was assessed. Grade 3+ or serious adverse events (AE) were summarized. Primary virologic endpoint was vRNA < 400c/mL or ≥1 log reduction. Secondary endpoints were vRNA < 50c/mL, and change in CD4 count (%). Efficacy analyses used Observed Failure missing data approach.
 
Results: Baseline characteristics, virologic and immunologic responses at weeks 24 and 48 for 96 subjects are in tables. Overall, virologic response was observed in 78.9%, RNA < 50c/mL in 56.7%, with mean CD4 increase 155.7 cells/uL. Through Week 48, there were 15 subjects with Grade 3+ clinical AEs (1 subject with drug related [DR] psychomotor hyperactivity, abnormal behavior and insomnia); 16 subjects with Grade 3+ laboratory AEs (1 with DR AST and ALT); 15 subjects with serious clinical AEs (1 with DR rash); 2 subjects with serious laboratory AEs (1 with DR transaminase increased); no discontinuations due to AEs and no deaths.
 
Conclusions: Two RAL formulations were studied in HIV infected youth ages 2 to 18 years.
 
At the selected doses, both formulations were well-tolerated and showed favorable virologic and immunologic responses.

IAC4.gif

IAC5.gif

IAC6.gif

IAC7.gif

IAC8.gif

IAC9.gif